Complete works of Stephanos Bibas (52)

1. 1994 “A Contractual Approach to Data Privacy” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
2. 1997 Using a model-based approach for monitoring telecommunication networks: the GASPAR system · IEE Colloquium on AI for Network Management Systems
3. 2001 Apprendi and the Dynamics of Guilty Pleas · Stanford Law Review
4. 2001 Apprendi's Perverse Effects on Guilty Pleas Under the Guidelines
5. 2001 Judicial Fact-Finding and Sentence Enhancements in a World of Guilty Pleas · The Yale Law Journal
6. 2002 Above the Fray: Supreme Court Should Let Judges Keep a Hand in Who Gets Executed
7. 2002 Back from the Brink: The Supreme Court Balks at Extending Apprendi to Upset Most Sentencing · Federal Sentencing Reporter
8. 2002 Harmonizing Substantive Criminal Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas
9. 2002 The Real-World Shift in Criminal Procedure
10. 2002 The Right to Remain Silent Helps Only the Guilty
11. 2003 Apprendi in the States: The Virtues of Federalism as a Structural Limit on Errors · The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)
12. 2003 Bringing Moral Values into a Flawed Plea Bargaining System
13. 2003 The Psychology of Hindsight and After-the-Fact Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
14. 2003 Using Plea Procedures to Combat Denial and Minimization
15. 2004 Blakely's Federal Aftermath · Federal Sentencing Reporter
16. 2004 Dozens of law-review articles, incl. Small Crimes Big Injustices (Michigan Law Review 2019) · Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology
17. 2004 Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure · The Yale Law Journal
18. 2004 Plea Bargaining outside the Shadow of Trial · Harvard Law Review
19. 2004 Pleas' Progress · Michigan Law Review
20. 2004 Reforming the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines after Blakely
21. 2004 The Feeney Amendment and the Continuing Rise of Prosecutorial Power to Plea Bargain · The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)
22. 2005 The Association Between Statutory Penalties and Domestic Elder Abuse Investigations · Journal of Crime and Justice
23. 2005 The Blakely Earthquake Exposes the Procedure/Substance Fault Line
24. 2006 “Transparency and Participation in Criminal Procedure” · New York University Law Review, Vol. 81
25. 2007 Rita v. United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers · Federal Sentencing Reporter
26. 2007 “Forgiveness in Criminal Procedure” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
27. 2009 “International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository this record
28. 2009 “Prosecutorial Regulation Versus Prosecutorial Accountability” · University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, No. 4, p. 959
29. 2009 “Rewarding Prosecutors for Performance” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
30. 2010 Neuroprediction, Violence, and the Law: Setting the Stage · Neuroethics
31. 2010 “The Need for Prosecutorial Discretion” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
32. 2011 Brief of <I>Amici Curiae</I> Criminal and Immigration Law Professors, Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition, Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, and Western Kentucky Refugee Mutual Assistance Society, Inc. In Support of Petitioner
33. 2011 Triaging Appointed-Counsel Funding and Pro Se Access to Justice
34. 2011 “Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor to Consumer Protection” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
35. 2011 “The Myth of the Fully Informed Rational Actor” · Saint Louis University Public Law Review
36. 2012 Notice-And-Comment Sentencing · Minnesota Law Review
37. 2012 Popular Moral Discourse Versus Mechanical Efficiency · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
38. 2012 Returning Power to the Public in a Lawyer-Driven System · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
39. 2012 The Long Drift from Morality Play to Machine · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
40. 2012 The Machinery of Criminal Justice
41. 2012 wDenial, Remorse, Apology, and Forgiveness · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
42. 2012 wOpaque, Unresponsive Criminal Justice · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
43. 2012 wWhose Voices Belong in Criminal Justice? · The Machinery of Criminal Justice
44. 2012 “Incompetent Plea Bargaining and Extrajudicial Reforms” · Penn Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
45. 2013 Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment · Michigan Law Review
46. 2016 “Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up: Accuracy and Fairness Without Trials as Backstops” · William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 57
47. 2016 “What’s Wrong With Sentencing Equality?” · Virginia Law Review, Vol. 102
48. 2017 Rationing Criminal Justice · Michigan Law Review
49. 2017 Rebooting Justice: More Technology, Fewer Lawyers, and the Future of Law · With Benjamin H. Barton
50. 2017 The psychology of defendant plea decision making. · American Psychologist
51. 2019 Small Crimes, Big Injustices · Michigan Law Review
52. 2020 3. Improve, Dynamite, or Dissolve the Criminal Regulatory State? · The New Criminal Justice Thinking