Article · 2024
What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? Considering the Neo-Confucians in the Contemporary Debate Between Moral and Intellectual Learning
Publication
- Title
- What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? Considering the Neo-Confucians in the Contemporary Debate Between Moral and Intellectual Learning
- Author
- John P. Shekitka (Columbia College, Class of 2007)
- Form
- Article
- First published
- 2024
- Publisher
- ECNU Review of Education 7(1)
Complete works of John P. Shekitka (6)
- 2020 Teaching Religion as a Part of the Social Studies: Superstructures, School Structures and Teacher Subjectivities · PhD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University
- 2022 School Structures and Curricular Choices: The Social Studies Classroom in Religious and Secular Schools · Religion & Education 49(2)
- 2022 Teaching about Religions in the Social Studies Classroom: The Post-9/11 World and the Post-Truth Age as Superstructures · Journal of Research on Christian Education 31(1)
- 2024 The Ethical and Civic Components of Climate Change · Oregon Journal of the Social Studies 12(2)
- 2024 What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? Considering the Neo-Confucians in the Contemporary Debate Between Moral and Intellectual Learning · ECNU Review of Education 7(1) this record
- 2025 Secular Narratives about Religions in the Social Studies and History Textbooks · Iowa Journal for the Social Studies 33(1)
Cite this record
Shekitka, John P.. What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? Considering the Neo-Confucians in the Contemporary Debate Between Moral and Intellectual Learning. ECNU Review of Education 7(1), 2024.
Foundation record: https://philolexianfoundation.org/members/shekitka-john-p-cc-2007/what-knowledge-is-of-most-worth-considering-the-neo-confucians-in-the-contempora-2024.html